January 13, 2004
On Reading the Preface and Introduction to J.R.R. Tolkien's Sanctifying Myth
So enough with the Tolkien posts already, but here's another one, and more good stuff on the website proper. I was in Pandemonium Books and Games today obtaining a copy of The Summer Tree by Guy Gavriel Kay when I came across the book by Bradley J. Birzer named above. Naturally, it was added to the purchase.
This is the sort of exegesis that makes the LotR special to me. Tolkien had two ultimate purposes in crafting the world of Middle-Earth. 1. To provide the United Kingdom with a myth cycle to rival its germanic and scandanavian neighbors. 2. To provide a blueprint and a "hope for a renewal of Christendom and an end to the ideologically inspired terror of the twentieth century." (Birzer, xxv)
Tolkien was a Christian Humanist.
If you really want to understand how Tolkien reconciles myth and Christianity, and puts forth his vision of a humanistic world, read Birzer's book. For those disinclined to scholarship, you can find the same thing straight from the horses mouth, the way J.R.R. Tolkien knew to say it best, in legend. Just read the last story of his to be published before his death, Smith of Wootton Major.
For the non-christians who can't find an easy entrance into the bible, just look to the five major heroes of the LotR as exemplars of Western Christendom. Each of the five show how one answers the Christian Humanists two questions, "(1) What is the role of the human person within God's creation? and (2) how does man order himself within God's creation?" (Birzer, xxv) The heroes are Gandalf, Aragorn, Faramir, Frodo and Sam, for those of you scoring at home.
I am not willing to follow Tolkien all the way back to his Catholicism, but I do follow him in rejecting the direction of modern thought. I am going to paraphrase and sometimes downright copy Bircher's words in providing that direction and Tolkien's rejection.
Myth is treated historically as a way (often the best way) to interpret, explain and provide meaning to a world that is immediately experienced by the community that makes the myth.
Secular modernity has removed itself from this immediate interaction with a "richly felt and imagined reality." (Birzer, xxiii) Paradoxically, pragmatism takes us further from an understanding of and an existence in the world than myth. When we disallow as "real" all knowledge not gained through the operation of the senses, we're not left with enough to produce a viable interpretation. Birzer quotes Romano Guardini's, Letters from Lake Como: Explorations in Technology and the Human Race, page 20: "In this new sphere things are no longer directly detected, seen, grasped, formed or enjoyed; rather they are mediated by signs and substitutes."
This leads the modernist to reject myth (and religion) as a lie. The postmodernist looks on myth as one subjective narrative among many with no inherent truth. Both relationships reject that myth contains anything that might help us transcend our limited data and make right sense of the world. This seems to many folks a wrong or false interaction with the world.
Neither viewpoint is ready to answer the question that seems an appropriate end of human inquiry to most of us, which of the many narratives we have to choose from are true(transcendent)? This question, is in my eyes, the dilemma of the postpostmodernist. How does one sift throught the nuggets and find out what's really going on? Evidence of a continuing human need to find these truths might be found in recognition that the fact that we have rejected so many of our past belief structures is a likely causal culprit for the sudden explosion of UFO cults in our communities.
Tolkien's sieve was Christianity, hence the need to sanctify the myths he wrote, to make them acceptably christian in message and method. In this pursuit he follows a long tradition of monks and priests incorporating pagan rituals and beliefs into the Christian Ideology to make the religion more palatable.
The rest of us who don't agree with the full message of Christianity are left to our own devices, but we can still appreciate the effort and the artistry, the genius of Tolkien's project and his product.
I've added some other nice quotes I culled from Birzer to the <language> section of the website. Check 'em out.
Posted by MetaMetadata at January 13, 2004 11:29 PMComments? You want comments?
I think this site is too austere, visually, right now. You need a little something going on up at the top, instead of leaping right into your post. Maybe a little something on the left margin too. Not clipart, not flashy things, not even necessarily color. Just start with a clearer (I mean, bigger) transition between your header thingy about Metametadata and the actual Post. Maybe pictures of cute puppies. Like a whole row of them chasing the next one's tail or something. Some can chase balls, some can be doing little pudgy puppy somersaults...
Okay, and the actual content? Alright. So you're talking about this need to understand the "truth" as if it is an essential human striving. What of the people who don't believe there is a "truth," let's call them minimalists, who look at the world around them and think that perhaps that world, mysteries and all, is enough? Maybe these are people who don't think there's a pattern or reason underneath it all. Or maybe they think that part of the nature of the pattern/reason is that it is inscrutable. These people, who move from one day to the next without maybe thinking much about the Universe and Reality and Humanity and Truth, are these people lazy? Apathetic? Insipid? Rob, I wonder if you think it is possible, or morally acceptable, to accept the Mystery without trying to solve it.
Posted by: Kendra at January 23, 2004 04:59 PM